MCOLES State Licensing Practice Exam

Is a Chemical Datamaster Breath Test admissible in court?

1. Yes, it is admissible

2. No, it is not admissible

3. Only with a warrant

4. Only if confirmed by another test

The correct answer is: Yes, it is admissible

The Chemical Datamaster Breath Test is considered admissible in court because it is based on sound scientific principles and methods that are widely accepted in forensic science. Courts typically allow the results of breathalyzer tests, including those conducted with the Datamaster, as evidence of a person's blood alcohol content (BAC) because the devices undergo rigorous testing and meet specific standards set by regulatory authorities. Additionally, the results can be supplemented by other evidence and testimony, but the primary data from a properly calibrated and maintained machine is generally accepted as reliable. This established admissibility stems from both statutory law and prior judicial rulings that recognize the test as a legitimate method for measuring BAC, making the results valuable in prosecuting DUI cases. In contrast, the other options, such as needing a warrant or requiring confirmation by another test, misunderstand the legal framework around breath testing evidence. While additional testing may be performed for corroboration purposes, the initial breath test alone can legitimately support a case in court when administered correctly.